As we have discussed, music is not an area of study that people
generally equate with "literacy." Before taking this class, I would have
fallen neatly into that category as well. As I have considered music
through a more inclusive perspective of literacy, I have discovered that
music is not as different from other subject areas as I thought. In my
mind, a more cognitive, critical approach to music is not only
possible, but extremely desirable. The concepts we have discussed have
affected the way I think about music, and they way I teach my students.
One
aspect of teaching I feel particularly strongly about is critical
literacy. I feel like this is where students really come into their own
as readers/thinkers. It goes beyond comprehension, knowledge, and
analysis, and enters a realm where students are challenged to develop
independent thought. To see past the text to the intent behind it. I
fully intend to challenge my students on this level in my own classroom,
and I believe that that starts with me. As I mentioned during the
Final, I believe that the first step in fostering critical thinking
skills in students is to admit to them (and to yourself) that you don't
know everything. That you are biased, that the student's have opinions
as valid as your own, and that you are not the only voice that matters
in the classroom. You cannot ask students to challenge authority figures
or question sources of information without allowing them to challenge
and question you. I can feel myself starting stepping up on my soap box
now, so I'll stop myself now before I get ahead. Suffice it to say, I
see it as my personal mission to show my students how intelligent they
are, and that they are entitled to an opinion and a voice. I know these
sound like lofty goals. Let me share a few thoughts I have on the day to
day approach to these ideals. I want students to have a knowledge of
score analysis and be able to critique a song, but I want them to
maintain the idea that music is art - it is subjective - and what they
feel or think about it is as valid an evaluation as any music
critique's. When grading, I want to give students opportunities to
defend and explain their answers. In my opinion there are no right and
wrong answers, there are only logical and illogical ones. If I can find a
way, I want to assess my students with that philosophy in mind. I
really feel like I could talk about critical literacy all day, but I
will move on for the sake of time...
I am
particularly fond of the before, during, and after reading activities we
discussed. Although I feel like many teachers do these things
instinctively, I have a better understanding now of their importance and
how to implement them most effectively. For example, doing activities
to get students' brains going and activate what they already know about a
subject. Like beginning a lecture about rhythmic notation by talking
about ratios, measuring units, or coinage. I also appreciate our
discussions on during activities. All too many times, teachers have
instructed me to sit quietly and read from a textbook, and although I am
a competent reader, this is never very effective. Students need
something to watch for, some guide for drawing information out of the
material. You see the very same thing with music. During activities make
the difference between passively and actively listening to a piece. For
example, students could be listening to a programmatic piece, and could
be drawing or writing or acting out what they think the music is
portraying. I believe they will get a lot more out of their listening
this way than if they just sit and let the music glaze over them. After
activities are a new and welcome addition to my teacher repertoire. I
feel like I often just give the students information and then leave it
at that. I know my students will do better if I pay more attention to
summarizing/evaluating the text after we go through it.
Vocabulary
is a large part of what we learn in the early stages of musicianship. I
really liked and will use a lot of the vocabulary activities that we
learned about in class. I also intend to take to heart the advice not to
teach more than eight or so terms at a time. My favorite chart was the
semantic feature analysis chart. This would be so useful in a guided
listening activity!
Differentiation. Now
this is a topic that I feel I cannot tie into a neat and tidy bow at the
end of this course. I will need to study it further. My instinctive
response to differentiation is that separate is not equal, it is only
separate. I think that treating students differently will only reinforce
and emphasize those differences. And I don't believe for a second that
the students won't catch on to what I'm doing. How can they not take "I
have a different assignment than my peers," to "I have an easier
assignment," and from there to "I am not as smart as they are." I just
can't abide that. On the other hand, I want my students to be
successful, and if they need additional support I want to give it to
them. So you see, I am really confused on this one. The scenario where
ELL students are given a multiple choice test rather than doing a more
involved activity... well I think that sounds like a horrible idea. What
do you learn from a multiple choice test? Very little! I think that
part of the reason that struggling students don't improve is that they
are given given devastatingly boring course work that doesn't stimulate
them! I don't think that I want to give my students different
assignments or evaluate them on different scales. I do think that I can
offer extra scaffolding to students without crossing these lines. For
example, helping them take an assignment apart into small steps that are
more manageable. Again, this is one of those dilemmas where it is extremely difficult to strike a balance between being helpful, and facilitating dependance. The only think I can do is keep an open mind and see what works in practice!
Using multiple languages in the classroom setting is easily accomplished for a choral director. Learning music form different cultures is a great way to celebrate those cultures. Students who speak multiple languages will have the advantage in this setting. I feel I really must learn Spanish. I have had students who speak spanish and they are disappointed when they find that I do not.
I feel like I could go on for a very long time talking about all I've learned in this class. But my blog post is starting to get really long, and so in the interest of my time and everyone else's, I'll leave it at that.
No comments:
Post a Comment